The WCWL panel on hip and knee replacement surgery developed and tested a set of standardized clinical criteria for setting priorities among patients awaiting hip and knee replacement surgery. The criteria were applied to 406 patients in four provinces. Regression analysis was used to determine the set of criteria weights that collectively best predicted clinicians’ overall urgency ratings. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was assessed using six videotaped patient interviews, scored by orthopaedic surgeons, related professionals, and general practitioners. The priority criteria accounted for over two-thirds of the observed variance in overall urgency ratings (adj.R2 = 67.6%). The panel modified the criteria and weights based on the empirical findings and clinical judgment. The reliability of the priority criteria for the hip and knee replacement tool was among the strongest of the five instruments developed in the WCWL project. The panel considered the criteria easy to use and reasonably reflective of expert surgical judgment regarding clinical urgency for hip and knee replacement.
WCWL Hip and Knee Replacement Prioritization Tool & Guide PDF
A full description of the development and testing of this tool can be found in the paper: Developing Priority Criteria for Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery: Results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project by Dr. Gordon Arnett, Dr. David Hadorn, and the Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project. (Canadian Journal of Surgery 2003; 46(4):290-296)
| Copyright ©2003 WCWL | site map terms of use search home | |